Limited Atonement: Rejecting What Was Never Provided? – Christian Article
This entry is part 3 of 3 in the series “Definite Atonement’s Indefinite Inferences” Read more posts by using the Table of Contents in the right sidebar. We have seen that to prove beyond reasonable doubt that Scripture teaches particular redemption, an advocate would need to show an explicit negation: a denial that Christ provided atonement for the non-elect. Instead of such a negation, we find references to universal provision of atonement. We find application of Christ’s atonement limited to…